TalkSPORT pundit Simon Jordan has discovered himself on the centre of controversy after suggesting that “karma” could have performed a job in Alexander Isak’s critical harm throughout Liverpool’s 2-1 victory away at Tottenham Hotspur.
The feedback, made within the aftermath of a being worried incident on Saturday night time, have drawn grievance from enthusiasts and commentators who felt the remarks crossed a line.
Isak suffered the harm in dramatic instances, hurting himself as he fired Liverpool into the lead towards Spurs.
The Swedish striker used to be stuck overdue via Tottenham defender Micky van de Ven whilst taking his shot and used to be instantly compelled off the pitch.
Next scientific checks have showed that Isak sustained a fibula fracture, an harm this is anticipated to rule him out for a number of months and represents a big setback at a a very powerful level of the season.
Jordan makes insensitive feedback about Alexander Isak
The incident has naturally sparked fear around the soccer group, given Isak’s significance to Liverpool and his popularity as probably the most Premier League’s most threatening forwards.
Early indications recommend the striker may face an extended rehabilitation procedure, together with his availability for the rest of the marketing campaign now in critical doubt.
Then again, it used to be Jordan’s response to the harm that generated essentially the most consideration. Talking on TalkSPORT, the previous Crystal Palace proprietor seemed to hyperlink Isak’s misfortune to occasions off the pitch previous in his profession.
Jordan referenced the striker’s arguable go out from Newcastle United, the place Isak had reportedly driven for a transfer away forward of the 2025/26 season after informing the membership he now not needed to play for them.
Jordan stated:
“I’m desperately trying to avoid myself disappearing into the ghost of Jacob Marley, and looking at the karma of Alexander Isak’s position in terms of not landing at Liverpool and achieving very much. He now potentially finds himself out for the season. I’m desperately trying to avoid that version of myself.
“I don’t want anyone breaking their legs, but I also look at the dynamics of how people behave and think, sometimes, that what goes around comes around. That’s mean-spirited, I know.”
Extra Tales / Newest Information
Lovers have now not taken Jordan’s feedback wellAlexander Isak of Liverpool (Picture via Alex Pantling/Getty Pictures)
The ones feedback had been extensively criticised, with many arguing that linking a major harm to previous switch selections is bigoted and insensitive.
After any such critical harm to a participant, those feedback are ill-time from Jordan and make no sense in any respect.
It looks like he’s simply seeking to ranking some degree over Isak via making such declare. From time to time, soccer pundits pass a boundary and Jordan’s feedback have accomplished that in this instance.
As enthusiasts, as pundits, as commentators, all of us have a accountability and Jordan failed to recognize that together with his feedback.
“Here we go” – Fabrizio Romano problems newest Liverpool switch replace
